The Signal Tribune newspaper

Letters, emails, statements and website comments | Nov. 10

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Eat the gay away?
Most Christians understand the biblical concept of loving the sinner yet hating the sin. Most Christians love people still lost in their sins, including members of the LGBTQ [community]. We seek only to be the hands and feet of the gospel, the good news of Jesus, the Christ, and pray God changes the hearts and minds of all LGBTQ members, bringing them to a place of repentance so that they might be eternally saved. I have faith that the new Chick-fil-A in Long Beach will serve as a beacon of love and truth to this community, that more people might come to understand the true meaning of love— God’s love. For He is love!

Don Bareford
(Website comment)

Measure displeasure?
There has been a growing discussion regarding the 31 proposed cannabis-dispensary sites to be located in the city of Long Beach. We have received several calls and emails in regard to the six proposed dispensaries located in the 5th District— at 4855 N Bellflower Blvd., 3401 N Norwalk Blvd., 5900 E Spring St., 3120 N Los Coyotes Diag., 3170 Cherry Ave., and 2760 E Spring St., in addition to one cultivation site at 2642 E Spring St.— wanting to know what I have done and will do about them.
I want you to know that I hear you and that I share the concerns that many have raised. That’s why I led the effort in the city council banning medical-marijuana dispensaries in the city of Long Beach more than a year ago. However, the medical-marijuana interests opposing the council’s ban put a citizen’s initiative, Measure MM, on the ballot last November to override the council’s decision. As adopted, this measure effectively allows medical-marijuana dispensaries and establishes the rules by which they could set up and operate.
Measure MM was adopted by the voters of Long Beach by a wide margin, and what you’re seeing now is the effect of that vote. The fact is Measure MM took away any discretion or authority of the city council regarding the placement and operation of medical-marijuana dispensaries in our neighborhoods. More information on Measure MM guidelines and established buffer zones can be found [at].
So it’s not that I don’t want to do anything about the dispensaries; it’s that the voters of Long Beach decided I shouldn’t have the ability to do anything about them, and that’s as disappointing to me as it is to you. My office and the City will monitor the operation of these dispensaries and take action as appropriate if they are operating outside of the rules. But what’s happening now is that they are following the rules as approved by the voters, which allows them to operate in the locations being discussed.
More information on the ongoing regulation and licensing, including the citywide map of each proposed business location, can be found [at]. Let’s work together to make sure these businesses remain compliant within the law.

Stacy Mungo
5th District
Long Beach

How does your city grow?
Long Beach is a great city. It has wonderful people, strong neighborhoods, a terrific location and a unique spirit that makes us all proud to live, work and play here. Recently, there has been a great deal of discussion over how our city will look in the future, as our community contemplates a revised land-use element. Land-use elements are one of the most important documents a city adopts, and it should reflect the results of community engagement, thoughtful planning and compliance with State law.
Land-use elements are required by the State of California to ensure every city is making wise and thoughtful decisions about land use and appropriately planning for population and job growth. Long Beach needs to plan for additional housing and commercial growth citywide by 2040. Great work has already occurred through the adopted Downtown Plan, Midtown Plan and the South East Specific Plan to account for much of the future need. The challenge we now collectively face is how to accommodate the remaining need throughout the entire city, in a manner that preserves existing single-family neighborhoods but also recognizes that housing and shopping opportunities in the future will likely not be single-family homes and traditional retail stores. These new opportunities, with appropriate planning and design, can become as much a part of our city as what we know and love today.
As the City seeks to adopt a revised land-use element, it is important to bear in mind that these proposed land uses will likely not be implemented today, tomorrow or even in the next decade. It is a plan for our children, and our children’s children. We must balance our city’s character and aspirations with the need to provide for a growing population. Where do we want to add new, quality housing? Where are the job centers? How do our residents commute to work or school? How do we retain quality shopping centers? Where will our future Cal State Long Beach graduates find employment and buy a home? These, and other questions, need to be answered if we are to achieve a preferred future. Simply saying “no” to a revised land-use element is not an option; we must plan for the future— in fact, the State mandates it.
The land-use element has sparked significant debate from some in the community, specifically relating to density, additional housing units and traffic. City staff have certainly heard those concerns throughout the past two years and, in particular, over the past few weeks. Next week, City staff will release revised maps. In these new maps, you will see a significant reduction in the proposed density in every area of Long Beach compared to the previous maps. The changes will be significant and should largely alleviate the concerns of most; however, we will continue to propose land-use changes that allow the City to meet the State mandates for accommodating housing and job growth.
I would like to encourage anyone interested in this topic to learn more and get involved. We need your constructive input and participation. As with any large project, misinformation often circulates more quickly than fact, so the City has spent considerable time answering questions from the community to help clarify and increase mutual understanding. Visit to get involved, to learn the facts and to gain a better understanding of this effort.
Lastly, I would ask that as we continue this journey together, we respect the varied input of all stakeholders, as well as City staff, who have worked hard to answer questions and make professional recommendations on how to tackle this challenge. Your City staff is committed to this process, to listen, to adapt and to make professional recommendations— that is their job. But calls for sanctioning City employees simply for doing their job, or because someone does not agree with their recommendation, is not constructive. In Long Beach, we pride ourselves on being inclusive— it is a part of who we are. I encourage all of us to remember that as we debate and provide our input. We all have important input to share and, as a community, we can do that respectfully and thoughtfully.

Patrick West
City manager
Long Beach

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Serving Bixby Knolls, California Heights, Los Cerritos, Wrigley and Signal Hill
Letters, emails, statements and website comments | Nov. 10